|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
01/04/2022 |
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
GRAHMANN, K.; RUBIO, V.; PEREZ-BIDEGAIN, M.; QUINCKE, A. |
Afiliación : |
KATHRIN GRAHMANN, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Resource-Efficient Cropping Systems, Research Area . Land Use and Governance, Müncheberg, Germany.; VALENTINA RUBIO DELLEPIANE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIO PEREZ-BIDEGAIN, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay.; JUAN ANDRES QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Soil use legacy as driving factor for soil erosión under conservation agriculture. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, volumen 10, article number 822967. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967 |
DOI : |
10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 26 November 2021/Accepted: 28 January 2022/Published: 28 February 2022. |
Contenido : |
Abstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and volatile solids were studied from 2017 to 2019. Soil physical (bulk density, penetration resistance, infiltration rate, aggregate stability), chemical (soil organic carbon (SOC), pH, phosphorous (P-Bray)) and biological properties (particulate organic matter (POM), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN)) were assessed in 2019. Yearly average runoff amounted 209, 579 and 320 mm in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Yearly average soil losses were 233, 805 and 139 kg/ha with significant differences among years. The lowest soil losses were observed in TIL_CP (231, 615 and 146 kg/ha in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively) with lowest IAI of 3.5. Infiltration rate was the lowest in plots with highest IAI. Soil bulk density was highest (1.3 g/cm3) in plots with high IAI. SOC and PMN were lowest in TIL_CROP (3.0% SOC and 34 mg/kg PMN), holding the highest IAI of 11.8. Conservation agriculture minimized soil erosion losses in all plots and years, and erosion was much lower than the maximum tolerable threshold of 7,000 kg/ha for this particular soil. However, in historically intensively tilled and cropped soils, soil quality showed long-term adverse effects pointing towards a reduced resilience of the agricultural system. MenosAbstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and v... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
INTENSIFICATION INDEX; LONG-TERM EXPERIMENT; RUNOFF; RUSLE; SEDIMENTS; SOIL DEDRADATION; SOIL DEGRADATION. |
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
P36 Erosión conservación y recuperación del suelo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16656/1/fenvs-10-822967.pdf
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967/pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03682naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1062950 005 2022-09-05 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967$2DOI 100 1 $aGRAHMANN, K. 245 $aSoil use legacy as driving factor for soil erosión under conservation agriculture.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received: 26 November 2021/Accepted: 28 January 2022/Published: 28 February 2022. 520 $aAbstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and volatile solids were studied from 2017 to 2019. Soil physical (bulk density, penetration resistance, infiltration rate, aggregate stability), chemical (soil organic carbon (SOC), pH, phosphorous (P-Bray)) and biological properties (particulate organic matter (POM), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN)) were assessed in 2019. Yearly average runoff amounted 209, 579 and 320 mm in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Yearly average soil losses were 233, 805 and 139 kg/ha with significant differences among years. The lowest soil losses were observed in TIL_CP (231, 615 and 146 kg/ha in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively) with lowest IAI of 3.5. Infiltration rate was the lowest in plots with highest IAI. Soil bulk density was highest (1.3 g/cm3) in plots with high IAI. SOC and PMN were lowest in TIL_CROP (3.0% SOC and 34 mg/kg PMN), holding the highest IAI of 11.8. Conservation agriculture minimized soil erosion losses in all plots and years, and erosion was much lower than the maximum tolerable threshold of 7,000 kg/ha for this particular soil. However, in historically intensively tilled and cropped soils, soil quality showed long-term adverse effects pointing towards a reduced resilience of the agricultural system. 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aINTENSIFICATION INDEX 653 $aLONG-TERM EXPERIMENT 653 $aRUNOFF 653 $aRUSLE 653 $aSEDIMENTS 653 $aSOIL DEDRADATION 653 $aSOIL DEGRADATION 700 1 $aRUBIO, V. 700 1 $aPEREZ-BIDEGAIN, M. 700 1 $aQUINCKE, A. 773 $tFrontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, volumen 10, article number 822967. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
20/11/2015 |
Actualizado : |
17/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
Autor : |
COZZOLINO, D.; FASSIO, A.; RESTAINO, E.; VICENTE, E. |
Afiliación : |
DANIEL COZZOLINO, Universidad de Adelaide; ALBERTO SANTIAGO FASSIO ARAUJO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ERNESTO ANGEL RESTAINO GALUP, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS ESTEBAN VICENTE CASTRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Instrumental techniques and methods: their role in plant omics. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Barh, D.; Khan, M.S.; Davies, E. (Eds.), 2015, PlantOmics: The Omics of Plant Science. Springer, p. 33-52. |
Páginas : |
p. 33-52. |
ISBN : |
978-81-322-2171-5 (Print) // 978-81-322-2172-2 (eBook) |
DOI : |
10.1007/978-81-322-2172-2_2 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Techniques and methods based on vibrational spectroscopy such as near-infrared refl ectance (NIR), mid-infrared (MIR) and Raman spectroscopy are known to be non-destructive and low cost.These characteristics are considered as the most important when these methods or techniques are applied in the fi eld of plant omics. This chapter will provide an overview of the most common vibrational spectroscopy techniques used in the fi eld of plant omic analysis (NIR, MIR, Raman). Information about the hardware (instruments) and software (multivariate data methods) will be also presented and discussed.
© Springer India 2015. |
Palabras claves : |
CHEMOMETRICS; ESPECTROSCOPÍA DE REFLECTANCIA EN EL INFRARROJO CERCANO; ESPECTROSCOPÍAS RAMAN; GENÓMICA VEGETAL; MÉTODOS DE ANÁLISIS RÁPIDO; MIR; NIR; NIRS; PLANT OMICS; QUIMIOMETRÍA; RAMAN; RAPID METHODS; SPECTROSCOPY. |
Thesagro : |
ESPECTROSCOPÍA ÓPTICA; NIRS. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 01672naa a2200361 a 4500 001 1053963 005 2019-10-17 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/978-81-322-2172-2_2$2DOI 100 1 $aCOZZOLINO, D. 245 $aInstrumental techniques and methods$btheir role in plant omics. 260 $c2015 300 $ap. 33-52. 520 $aABSTRACT. Techniques and methods based on vibrational spectroscopy such as near-infrared refl ectance (NIR), mid-infrared (MIR) and Raman spectroscopy are known to be non-destructive and low cost.These characteristics are considered as the most important when these methods or techniques are applied in the fi eld of plant omics. This chapter will provide an overview of the most common vibrational spectroscopy techniques used in the fi eld of plant omic analysis (NIR, MIR, Raman). Information about the hardware (instruments) and software (multivariate data methods) will be also presented and discussed. © Springer India 2015. 650 $aESPECTROSCOPÍA ÓPTICA 650 $aNIRS 653 $aCHEMOMETRICS 653 $aESPECTROSCOPÍA DE REFLECTANCIA EN EL INFRARROJO CERCANO 653 $aESPECTROSCOPÍAS RAMAN 653 $aGENÓMICA VEGETAL 653 $aMÉTODOS DE ANÁLISIS RÁPIDO 653 $aMIR 653 $aNIR 653 $aNIRS 653 $aPLANT OMICS 653 $aQUIMIOMETRÍA 653 $aRAMAN 653 $aRAPID METHODS 653 $aSPECTROSCOPY 700 1 $aFASSIO, A. 700 1 $aRESTAINO, E. 700 1 $aVICENTE, E. 773 $tIn: Barh, D.; Khan, M.S.; Davies, E. (Eds.), 2015, PlantOmics: The Omics of Plant Science. Springer, p. 33-52.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|